Nobahar
Khan
At Nobahar Khan LLP, we prioritize delivering results with professionalism and consistency. Every case receives the focused attention it deserves, as we work closely with our clients to help them make informed legal decisions.
In a world of ever-changing regulations and legal challenges, our experienced and forward-thinking lawyers bring valuable insight and expertise to each matter. Explore our areas of practice and reach out to us today!
-

Ali Nobahar
Partner
Ali graduated summa cum laude from York University where he obtained his Bachelor of Arts (Hons) degree in Political Science. He received his J.D. degree from Osgoode Hall Law School and was called to the Bar of Ontario thereafter.
Ali is a respected Barrister and Solicitor with several years of practical experience in different areas of law. Ali’s areas of practice include real estate, estates, civil litigation and corporate law amongst others. Outside of the practice of law, Ali’s interests include health and fitness.
-

Basil Khan
Partner
Basil Khan is an experienced business lawyer, litigation lawyer and real estate lawyer licensed by the Law Society of Ontario. Basil founded Helix Law Professional Corporation in 2017, a boutique Toronto, Ontario law firm to help businesses and people navigate the law. Basil Khan then partnered with Ali Nobahar in 2024 and established NOBAHAR KHAN LLP. Basil provides top tier legal advice and representation to businesses and individuals in all principal areas of business law, corporate law, civil litigation, commercial litigation, construction, real estate law, real estate closings, trusts, wills and estates.
Basil fiercely advocates for his clients and represents his clients in all levels of court. Basil has appeared before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Divisional Court and Tax Court of Canada. Basil has managed a variety of civil matters including professional liability, breach of contract claims, construction disputes, debt collections, real estate disputes, tax disputes, estate disputes, corporate/commercial disputes and shareholder/partnership disputes.
Representative Cases:
Reid v. Abass, 2024 ONSC 7083
Ontario Superior Court of JusticeSuccessful defence of a summary judgment motion in a failed residential real estate transaction. The plaintiff vendors sought $149,000 in damages — the difference between the original $999,000 purchase price and the $850,000 at which the property later sold — after the purchase did not close on time. Acting for the defendants, Basil Khan argued that, read as a whole, the parties' July 2022 extension agreement released the purchaser from liability for the price difference provided he completed the transaction at the reduced amount, which he did. The Court agreed, dismissed the plaintiffs' motion, and granted summary judgment in favour of the defendants.
Dicenzo (Linden Park) Holdings Inc. v. Sadeghyar, 2026 ONSC 1566 — Landmark Decision
Ontario Superior Court of Justice | Reported in the Ontario Reports 180 O.R. (3d) Part 8, Pages 605-617, 6/26/2026 editionA landmark ruling on consumer protection under the Condominium Act, 1998. Acting for the purchaser of a pre-construction condominium in Hamilton, Basil Khan successfully resisted a builder's application to forfeit a $121,098 deposit and recover more than $218,000 in damages after the purchase failed to close. The Court accepted the argument that the builder had never delivered the mandatory Residential Condominium Buyers' Guide required by s. 72(1)(b) of the Act, with the result that the agreement of purchase and sale was not binding on the purchaser. This was the first reported decision to consider the consequences of a builder's failure to provide the Guide — the Court confirmed that where the Guide is not delivered, the 10-day rescission period never begins to run and the purchaser may rescind at any time before taking title, notwithstanding a signed acknowledgment of receipt. The builder's application was dismissed, the purchaser's cross-application granted, and the deposit ordered returned with interest, plus $31,000 in costs. [Note: this matter is presently under appeal to the Court of Appeal for Ontario]